[arch-general] Err... Why is gvim now conflicting with vim?
jwbirdsong at jwbirdsong.homelinux.com
Sun May 9 10:14:51 EDT 2010
On 05/09/2010 12:35 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 08/05/10 23:11, Matěj Týč wrote:
>> What's wrong with that pacmatic functionality that shomehow tries to
>> solve this, since it is not implemented in pacman?
> pacmantic's functionality is Arch specific while pacman is not.
> Message 29 in a thread that had the initial question answered in post
> #2... :)
Glad someone said it.
More information about the arch-general