[arch-general] Err... Why is gvim now conflicting with vim?

Allan McRae allan at archlinux.org
Sun May 9 02:35:18 EDT 2010

On 08/05/10 23:11, Matěj Týč wrote:
> What's wrong with that pacmatic functionality that shomehow tries to
> solve this, since it is not implemented in pacman?

pacmantic's functionality is Arch specific while pacman is not.

Message 29 in a thread that had the initial question answered in post 
#2...   :)

More information about the arch-general mailing list