[arch-general] python3 thoughts
auguste at gmail.com
Fri Nov 12 19:46:41 CET 2010
The transition is indeed smooth, as least for me. I am just worrying
that maybe most python utilities will remain using python2 for a
rather long time.
Considering the incompatibility in the fundamental print
function/statement, I seriously doubt the number of python2 packages
that can run under python3 without any modification.
Most python programmers are clearly not so interested in the
bleeding-edge technologies. That's what makes me frustrated as an Arch
> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:11:56 -0500
> From: Isaac Dupree <ml at isaac.cedarswampstudios.org>
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] python3 thoughts
> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general at archlinux.org>
> Message-ID: <4CDCE8BC.4080107 at isaac.cedarswampstudios.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> On 11/12/10 01:51, Auguste Pop wrote:
>> I hope python3 won't die this way, so that all the previous efforts in
>> transition to python3 will not go in vain. Maybe we just took the
>> transitional leap too early when nobody is ready except us.
> As you note, "nobody is ready except us" -- we are ready -- the pain is
> not very much. On the flip side, the little pain that we do feel is a
> really valuable offering to the other more conservative distros: they
> get to see how it was for us and what the biggest pain points are in
> You're also (I think?) making a good point that, at least where upstream
> projects written in python can run on python3, we as packagers should
> proactively package them to do so. We should be conscious if we're
> letting them languish in the doldrums of 2-ness untended.
More information about the arch-general