[arch-general] no python3 package?

Angus charmender at gmail.com
Thu Oct 7 00:40:27 EDT 2010

I'm glad Arch did the python3 transition and I agree with python3
being the default version (i.e. having 'python' symlink to

But what's the reason for no longer having a package named 'python3'
with a symlink to 'python3.x'? It would make (/have made) the
transition a little easier, no? Any harm done in providing it?

More information about the arch-general mailing list