[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts-2011.04.1-2

[Ángel Velásquez]

2011/4/29 Heiko Baums <lists at baums-on-web.de>:
> Am Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:07:58 -0400
> schrieb Matthew Gyurgyik <pyther at pyther.net>:
>
>> I'm with Thomas here. If it bugs you that much submit some patches.
>> It seems as if you always have an opinion, but rarely have a solution
>> and/or patches.
>
> And I say my opinion, at least if I see that there could be
> regressions or serious issues. If it's just a misunderstanding due to
> too little informations given with an announcement it can easily be
> cleared up by explaining it a bit more detailed.
>
> I'm not a developer, so this may be one of the reasons for not giving
> patches or solutions so many times. If I have one, I usually give it,
> and I did it quite a few times already.
>
>> Folks, don't forget, arch isn't a democracy. The developers do what
>> they want.
>
> Then the developers should just develop for themselves without
> releasing it publically or without creating a community around it, if
> they don't want to listen to the users and their opinions. And/or they
> should just say on the homepage: "You may use it, but if it fails
> you're on your own." But I doubt that this is the opinion of most of the
> developers.
>
> Heiko
>

Ok are you freaking joking on me? Why we have to worry about other OS?
if they do the wrong things, then report it to them, we don't have to
eat a hundreds of bugs, just because you like a crappy os just for
game.

That said, good job Tom!

-- 
Angel Velásquez
angvp @ irc.freenode.net
Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User
Linux Counter: #359909
http://www.angvp.com