[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

[Vic Demuzere]

On Aug 2, 2011 6:53 PM, "C Anthony Risinger" <anthony at xtfx.me> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Tom Gundersen <teg at jklm.no> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger <anthony at xtfx.me>
wrote:
> >>
> >> ... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26`
> >> package was to also have a `kernel24` (from what i read -- wasn't
> >> around then) how is this handled with the `linux` package?  or is this
> >> a non-issue?
> >
> > We no longer support linux 2.4... How would this be an issue?
>
> sorry i wasn't clear -- i meant when the time comes that dual support
> would be desirable, eg. linux 4.7 or whatever :-)
>
> C Anthony

Why would you do that for the kernel, but not for other packages?

-- 
vic at demuzere.be :: http://vic.demuzere.be :: PGP: 0x6690CF94
My software never contains bugs, it just develops random features.

Sent from my phone, please excuse my brevity.