[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

[C Anthony Risinger]

On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Vic Demuzere <vic at demuzere.be> wrote:
> On Aug 2, 2011 6:53 PM, "C Anthony Risinger" <anthony at xtfx.me> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Tom Gundersen <teg at jklm.no> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger <anthony at xtfx.me>
> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> ... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26`
>> >> package was to also have a `kernel24` (from what i read -- wasn't
>> >> around then) how is this handled with the `linux` package?  or is this
>> >> a non-issue?
>> >
>> > We no longer support linux 2.4... How would this be an issue?
>>
>> sorry i wasn't clear -- i meant when the time comes that dual support
>> would be desirable, eg. linux 4.7 or whatever :-)
>>
>> C Anthony
>
> Why would you do that for the kernel, but not for other packages?

meh whatever :-)  i guess i don't really care anyway since i would
never run an older one, but i thought there was a technical reason for
the split originally ... though that reason is escaping me now
(providing said reason even existed and im not just fabricating it).

C Anthony