[arch-general] Installation of libreoffice
Cédric Girard
girard.cedric at gmail.com
Wed Aug 3 07:53:16 EDT 2011
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas at archlinux.org> wrote:
> Yes, that shouldn't be. It's broken the way it is - either the group
> should be renamed, or the provides should be removed.
>
It's not the first time something similar happen. I think of some packages
that have been split and put within a group sharing one of the package name.
Maybe the way pacman handle groups must be changed to let user have choice,
even if group, package or provides are the same.
--
Cédric Girard
More information about the arch-general
mailing list