[arch-general] Installation of libreoffice

[Cédric Girard]

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas at archlinux.org> wrote:

> Yes, that shouldn't be. It's broken the way it is - either the group
> should be renamed, or the provides should be removed.
>

It's not the first time something similar happen. I think of some packages
that have been split and put within a group sharing one of the package name.

Maybe the way pacman handle groups must be changed to let user have choice,
even if group, package or provides are the same.

-- 
Cédric Girard