[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [RFC] the storage group
myra.nelson at hughes.net
Sat Aug 27 20:15:56 EDT 2011
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 17:43, Tom Gundersen <teg at jklm.no> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Tom Gundersen <teg at jklm.no> wrote:
>> I'm refactoring our support for the "storage" group, due to a recent
>> bug report about it being incomplete:
>> <https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22337>. I thought I'd ask for some
> I did a bit more digging and asking around, and it seems that my
> previous suggestion, basically to make "storage" work correctly with
> more devices, is not a good one.
> I tried pushing the fix into udev upstream, but Kay argued against it,
> and even the Debian maintainer agreed that this should probably not go
> Their reasoning (which I guess I agree with) is that giving users
> access to usb sticks (among other things) causes security probems (the
> user logged in over ssh can access the usb stick of the logged in
> Furthermore, (and this I did not know) in addition to taking care of
> mounting, udisks has support for most of what fdisk does, so there
> goes the main argument in favor of giving user access to these
> To make a long story short; in stead of fixing the "storage" group, I
> intend to remove support for it from udev, and direct people to use
> udisks instead. If anyone have any objections, pleas let me know.
Pardon the interruption but from a former MS user and basically an end
user I thought I would chime in. Auto mounting is evil and the autorun
feature associated with it is worse. I think removing it from udev is
an excellent idea and I laud your suggestion. It will definitely
improve security and, IMHO, make things easier to setup. One only has
to learn one method, preferably the "correct" method, to do something.
I use the word correct because their are at least 3 right ways to do
things. Your way, my way, and the next person's way. None of which may
be the correct way.
Life's fun when your sick and psychotic!
More information about the arch-general