[arch-general] Is there a clean solution to get completely rid of Pulseaudio?

Leonid Isaev lisaev at umail.iu.edu
Fri Dec 23 10:44:41 EST 2011


On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:57:11 +0100
Ralf Madorf <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 10:17 +0000, Peter Lewis wrote:
> > And if you want to, file a bug report upstream about the dependency on
> > pulse.
> 
> As others already pointed out. It's not a bug regarding to Arch
> packages, but the policy of GNOME3 to make it the default sound sever.
> OTOH here should be a possibility to fake this dependency, since this
> won't break GNOME for pro-audio usage, while PA tend to cause issues for
> pro-audio.
> 
> To whom should I file a bug report, resp. a my wish?
> 
> - Ralf
> 

If you want to be even considered there, I suggest you rethink your
position. Bug reports like "change PA to ALSA because I hate the former" are
not constructive since they imply that devs are morons and made a bad
choice. Can you suggest something better? I don't think so.

Pulseaudio is a pretty good piece of software with very precise goals. DEs
strive to provide the best user experience possible, that's why gnome devs
chose PA. If you don't want PA don't use gnome.

If I were you, I would look into recompiling gdb/whatever w/o PA support...

-- 
Leonid Isaev
GnuPG key ID: 164B5A6D
Key fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE  775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20111223/1a4126e5/attachment.asc>


More information about the arch-general mailing list