[arch-general] is udev-164 a safe solution at the moment

[Thomas Bächler]

Am 20.01.2011 06:51, schrieb Attila:
> Hi,
> 
> still again after every 20 or 30 new boot udev-165 hangs both pc's with 
> archlinux. So my question is that if i step back to udev-164 will there be 
> problems with the initscripts or any other plans what you the devs have in the 
> near future? If yes than i can (or have to) live with this because it is very 
> seldom and therefore very hard to find out what is the problem.
> 
> See you, Attila

Some people actually tracked down the kernel bug that is causing this,
but nobody opened a bug report about it upstream. If this is the same
bug I heard about, a workaround is deleting /lib/udev/ata_id.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20110120/cc36a889/attachment.asc>