[arch-general] is udev-164 a safe solution at the moment
Ty John (sand_man)
ty-ml at eye-of-odin.com
Thu Jan 20 04:58:22 EST 2011
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 10:38 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 20.01.2011 06:51, schrieb Attila:
> > Hi,
> > still again after every 20 or 30 new boot udev-165 hangs both pc's with
> > archlinux. So my question is that if i step back to udev-164 will there be
> > problems with the initscripts or any other plans what you the devs have in the
> > near future? If yes than i can (or have to) live with this because it is very
> > seldom and therefore very hard to find out what is the problem.
> > See you, Attila
> Some people actually tracked down the kernel bug that is causing this,
> but nobody opened a bug report about it upstream. If this is the same
> bug I heard about, a workaround is deleting /lib/udev/ata_id.
Is there a big report on this? I would like to know if it is the same
problem as what I am experiencing or not.
More information about the arch-general