[arch-general] should imagemagick-doc really be i686/x86_64
ibiru at archlinux.org
Thu Jan 27 05:45:05 EST 2011
On 01/27/2011 12:41 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
> I am not aware of the package until I saw it listed on the home page
> of Archlinux today. Just out of curiosity, I skimmed the contents of
> the package and find out that they are mainly html files. Shouldn't it
> be "any" rather than i686/x86_64? Should I file a bug report or this
> is just my ignorance of imagemagick?
> Thank you for your kind attention.
is not a bug. is more a impossibility to split 'any' packages like that.
makepkg supports such splits but our server scripts doesn't handle them
More information about the arch-general