[arch-general] should imagemagick-doc really be i686/x86_64

Auguste Pop auguste at gmail.com
Thu Jan 27 05:51:02 EST 2011

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Ionuț Bîru <ibiru at archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 12:41 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am not aware of the package until I saw it listed on the home page
>> of Archlinux today. Just out of curiosity, I skimmed the contents of
>> the package and find out that they are mainly html files. Shouldn't it
>> be "any" rather than i686/x86_64? Should I file a bug report or this
>> is just my ignorance of imagemagick?
>> Thank you for your kind attention.
>> Yours,
> is not a bug. is more a impossibility to split 'any' packages like that.
> makepkg supports such splits but our server scripts doesn't handle them at
> all.
> --
> Ionuț

I see. Thank you for the enlightening.

And thank you all for all the quick replies. This is just amazing. ;-)

More information about the arch-general mailing list