[arch-general] should imagemagick-doc really be i686/x86_64

Sven-Hendrik Haase sh at lutzhaase.com
Thu Jan 27 07:10:20 EST 2011

"Ionuț Bîru" <ibiru at archlinux.org> wrote:

>On 01/27/2011 12:41 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am not aware of the package until I saw it listed on the home page
>> of Archlinux today. Just out of curiosity, I skimmed the contents of
>> the package and find out that they are mainly html files. Shouldn't
>> be "any" rather than i686/x86_64? Should I file a bug report or this
>> is just my ignorance of imagemagick?
>> Thank you for your kind attention.
>> Yours,
>is not a bug. is more a impossibility to split 'any' packages like
>makepkg supports such splits but our server scripts doesn't handle them
>at all.

Indeed, but can still create a separate 'any' package like we do with some games. Just a split package won't work there.

More information about the arch-general mailing list