[arch-general] should imagemagick-doc really be i686/x86_64

Eric Bélanger snowmaniscool at gmail.com
Thu Jan 27 08:21:39 EST 2011

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh at lutzhaase.com> wrote:
> "Ionuț Bîru" <ibiru at archlinux.org> wrote:
>>On 01/27/2011 12:41 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I am not aware of the package until I saw it listed on the home page
>>> of Archlinux today. Just out of curiosity, I skimmed the contents of
>>> the package and find out that they are mainly html files. Shouldn't
>>> be "any" rather than i686/x86_64? Should I file a bug report or this
>>> is just my ignorance of imagemagick?
>>> Thank you for your kind attention.
>>> Yours,
>>is not a bug. is more a impossibility to split 'any' packages like
>>makepkg supports such splits but our server scripts doesn't handle them
>>at all.
> Indeed, but can still create a separate 'any' package like we do with some games. Just a split package won't work there.

FTR, there used to be a seperate 'any' imagemagick-doc packge but I
just removed it because it was too much work and it was often
forgotten when other devs were rebuilding or updating imagemagick.
Plus, it's only 3MB.

More information about the arch-general mailing list