[arch-general] should imagemagick-doc really be i686/x86_64
allan at archlinux.org
Thu Jan 27 05:53:33 EST 2011
On 27/01/11 20:41, Auguste Pop wrote:
> I am not aware of the package until I saw it listed on the home page
> of Archlinux today. Just out of curiosity, I skimmed the contents of
> the package and find out that they are mainly html files. Shouldn't it
> be "any" rather than i686/x86_64? Should I file a bug report or this
> is just my ignorance of imagemagick?
> Thank you for your kind attention.
It is build as a split package with imagemagick. Currently our
dbscripts do not handle split packages with arch=('i686' 'x86_64') and
More information about the arch-general