[arch-general] PKGBUILD - howto handle 'src' when svn source is already in PKGBUILD dir?
Kirill Churin
reflexing at reflexing.ru
Fri Jan 28 11:40:54 EST 2011
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:02 PM, David C. Rankin <
drankinatty at suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/28/2011 02:57 AM, Kirill Churin wrote:
>
>> See how this is handled e.g. in this PKGBGUILD:
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-git/mesa-git/PKGBUILD
>>
>>
> Thank you Kirill!
>
> So it looks like I need to backup one (or two) directories and do the
> PKGBUILD higher up in the svn tree rather than on a 'per module' basis. Is
> there a general rule of thumb to figure out where to put it? Take for
> example the svn tree:
>
> applications
> abakus
> adept
> amarok
> basket
> <snip>
> dependencies
> arts
> tqtinterface
> kdeaccessibility
> kdeaddons
> kdeadmin
> <snip>
>
> looking at mesa, they do the PKGBUILD at the top, build everything, then
> 'package' the various pieces (modules) individually. What is the thought
> process for determining whether you put one PKGBUILD at the top and do it
> like mesa or whether you put one PKGBUID in each major module and build from
> there? Example:
>
> applications
> PKGBUILD
> dependencies
> PKGBUILD
> kdeaccessibility
> PKGBUILD
> <snip>
>
> Is it just a 'whatever makes the PKGBUILD' setup work best? Or are there
> some fast and hard rules like a 'one subdirectory limit' that I need to
> know?
>
> Thanks Again.
>
> --
> David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
>
Why don't you look how do KDE packages currently handled in Arch? I think
you can apply it's basic principles to your Trinity packages as well.
E.g.
http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/kde-meta/trunk/PKGBUILD
and
it's deps…
<http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/kde-meta/trunk/PKGBUILD>
--
Kirill Churin
Jabber: reflexing at reflexing.ru, ICQ: 8163230, Skype on demand.
More information about the arch-general
mailing list