[arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

[Ray Rashif]

If it's a number of PKGBUILDs, place them for eg. in google code under
a project name eg. "arch-trinity". This allows a one-stop location to
check out everything. You can of course use an aur uploader to mass
upload them. Or you can do both.


On 30 January 2011 15:58, Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 1:00 AM, David C. Rankin
> <drankinatty at suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
>> On 01/29/2011 12:09 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
>>> 2011/1/28 David C. Rankin <drankinatty at suddenlinkmail.com>
>>>
>>>> On 01/28/2011 11:30 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>        So what say the powers that be? Do the wiki page here or
>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> Trinity?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The wiki is for Arch-related documentation, so why not?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes! wiki it up!
>>>>> kde3 is only dead as long as noone maintains it. That's how Arch works,
>>>>> after all. So yes, I think putting Trinity on the wiki is fine, and it
>>>>> should/will only get nixed if it stops getting maintained.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Peter, Ray, Thomas and Ng,
>>>>
>>>>        I'll get the framework done this weekend. It is a double bonus doing
>>>> it here,
>>>> Trinity uses FosWiki and it is miserable compared to mediawiki :)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks David, I am excited to see it!
>>>
>>> -Thomas S Hatch
>>>
>>
>> Guys,
>>
>>  I have gotten the outline for the Trinity page completed and have made good
>> headway getting the contents up. I still have information to add, but my fingers
>> wore out. I get the remaining info up in the next day or so. The page is:
>>
>> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trinity
>>
>>  I still need to know what to do with the PKGBUILDs I have so far. I don't know
>> if I should upload them as part of the wiki, or just provide links to them on
>> another site. I'll create the links once I know where you guys want me to put
>> them. I can just leave them on my server (it's no size or bandwidth issue)
>>
>>  If you have thoughts or ideas for solving some of the problems mentioned in
>> the wiki, let me know. I'm shallow on experience with PKGBUILDs, but learning
>> fast. That's it for now.
>>
>>
>
> The best place for any PKGBUILD is really in the AUR and maybe under a
> seperate source control, but that's not really required.
>