[arch-general] Frequency of abs updates, would increasing frequency cost much?

Ng Oon-Ee ngoonee at gmail.com
Mon Jan 31 06:00:18 EST 2011


On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 18:45 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 31 January 2011 17:45, Jelle van der Waa <jelle at vdwaa.nl> wrote:
> > I can't imagine a user waiting for a updated package of foo when there
> > is a new version out and he wants to rebuild. (He just does that
> > himself)
> >
> > To rest my case, i think the current situation is good enough.
> 
> He already mentioned that he can "manually access the SVN interface".
> He needs the ABS way because he's using bauerbill to patch up stuff.
> 
> So you should bug the bauerbill author to include some kind of
> alternative, say, SVN/GIT support.

Thanks Ray, that's precisely the situation.

And I did bug the author prior to posting her, who replied that he
wouldn't =). Fair enough, its kinda a niche requirement in any case.



More information about the arch-general mailing list