[arch-general] Frequency of abs updates, would increasing frequency cost much?

[Jelle van der Waa]

On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 19:00 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 18:45 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
> > On 31 January 2011 17:45, Jelle van der Waa <jelle at vdwaa.nl> wrote:
> > > I can't imagine a user waiting for a updated package of foo when there
> > > is a new version out and he wants to rebuild. (He just does that
> > > himself)
> > >
> > > To rest my case, i think the current situation is good enough.
> > 
> > He already mentioned that he can "manually access the SVN interface".
> > He needs the ABS way because he's using bauerbill to patch up stuff.
> > 
> > So you should bug the bauerbill author to include some kind of
> > alternative, say, SVN/GIT support.
> 
> Thanks Ray, that's precisely the situation.
> 
> And I did bug the author prior to posting her, who replied that he
> wouldn't =). Fair enough, its kinda a niche requirement in any case.
> 

Ah, i misunderstood, sorry  ;)

-- 
Jelle van der Waa
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20110131/15c31e41/attachment.asc>