[arch-general] hwclock and openntpd
Paul Gideon Dann
pdgiddie at gmail.com
Fri Jun 10 07:05:26 EDT 2011
On Saturday 04 June 2011 08:44:34 Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 03:06 -0400, Yclept Nemo wrote:
> > Perhaps openntpd does not set the hwclock. Therefore, should openntpd
> > be used in conjuction with the hwclock daemon?
> That's true, and that's also the reason why Openntpd doesn't play well
> with Xen where all guest VMs will take over the clock from the host VM.
> With the normal ntp distribution that works, but with Openntpd you need
> something to push the changes to the hwclock.
I've found this gnawing at me since I read it. I originally started using
OpenNTPD because it was smaller, lighter, and easier to configure. However,
it's disappointing that it doesn't deal better with the hardware clock.
Searching around for more information, I discovered that OpenNTPD is not
currently well supported for Linux, and the "portable" version that our
package is based on is lagging significantly behind the mainline.
I've heard a few people mention Chrony as a good alternative, and I like the
sound of it. There's an AUR package, but no Wiki entry. Has anyone given
Chrony a shot, or have any strong opinions about it?
More information about the arch-general