[arch-general] Vim with X
manolo at austrohungaro.com
Tue Nov 15 16:58:27 EST 2011
On 11/15/11 at 11:57pm, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 15 November 2011 22:00, Manolo Martínez <manolo at austrohungaro.com> wrote:
> The policy had already been revised when the split was made to have
> vim and gvim. Vim had to become lightweight as many people were
> complaining about its bulk.
Thanks for the explanation, Ray. I guess I should learn to make do without
copying among X programs, as those people doubtlessly do.
More information about the arch-general