[arch-general] ASLR and PIE wider adoption.
lisaev at umail.iu.edu
Mon Apr 16 11:58:59 EDT 2012
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:37:13 +0100
Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1ists at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:58:36 +0200
> Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> > (especially on 32bit).
> Slightly on 32bit and almost no difference on 64bit. OpenBSD uses PIEs
> everywhere and my x86 users say everythings much quicker than Windows.
> Fair enough though as long as you do have a good understanding of the
> real difference to users. I'm quite happy, it would just be better all
> Phones have very litle resources and despite the bull that many believe,
> an x86 cycle is not even close to an arm cycle and yet Android now
> uses PIE for better ASLR. Please don't bring up geekbench or coremark
> as that's a crock for cross architecture if you look at the stated
> caveats by coremark or details and results by geekbench. Your better of
> measuring in time to accomplish something.
> I read in a forum which was completely unsubstantiated that Google
> on OpenBSD also.
> Alpine uses ulibc for size and speed and still PIE.
+1 for all arches. However, some programs will fail to build straightforwadly,
e.g. evince, cpupower, claws-mail.
GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D
Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the arch-general