[arch-general] pacman's default download manager?

Kevin Chadwick ma1l1ists at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Aug 2 06:01:22 EDT 2012


> > On my personal machine I've long-since changed XferCommand, but on
> > doing a new install on another machine with the latest iso (behind a
> > proxy, which is a first for me), I figured out that a problem I was
> > having was linked to pacman NOT using wget by default. Is it just me,
> > or wasn't wget the default before?  
> 
> As Mantas correctly indicated, pacman does not use an external download
> manager by default, but it downloads files internally using curl.
> 
> Why would you even change that behaviour? Using an external download
> manager only slows pacman down.

Considering the bugs that wget has had without -o that could be
dangerous as root as well as other bugs in curl. I've always thought
system updates should be downloading as say a _pacman user. One day I
may get enough free time to sort that out.


-- 
_______________________________________________________________________

'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work
together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a
universal interface'

(Doug McIlroy)
_______________________________________________________________________


More information about the arch-general mailing list