[arch-general] pacman 4 in [core]

[Thomas Bächler]

Am 16.01.2012 22:12, schrieb Karol Blazewicz:
> Is it for real or is it an error?
> 
> I know that you should merge pacnew files first, I'm fine with the
> move, but something tells me we're going to see many users baffled by
> pacman throwing never-before seen errors.
> Not that I mind Arch being a less hand-holding distro and actually
> requiring common sense ;P

Your question is probably about signatures. We're not entirely there
yet, but as pacman 4 brings lots of other fixes and improvements, it was
a good idea to move it.

If you want to use signed packages (and are okay that databases aren't
signed yet, and not everything is signed), you can follow [1].

[1] http://allanmcrae.com/2011/12/pacman-package-signing-4-arch-linux/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20120116/f672eb33/attachment.asc>