[arch-general] change in mount behaviour?

[G. Schlisio]

Am 28.01.2012 01:02, schrieb Leonid Isaev:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:49:03 +0100
> "G. Schlisio"<g.schlisio at gmx.de>  wrote:
>
>> Am 28.01.2012 00:46, schrieb Leonid Isaev:
>>> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:26:38 +0100
>>> "G. Schlisio"<g.schlisio at gmx.de>   wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> i used to keep a folder in /media to serve as mountpoint if some manual
>>>> mountis was needed.
>>>> since some days, this folder disappeared, even if created again.
>>>> is there any change in filesystems, kernel or whatsoever changing
>>>> behavior there, is it intended (if so, why?) or a bug?
>>>> every hint appreciated.
>>>> georg
>>> That is what /mnt is for... Do you have systemd?
>>>
>> jipp, just switched to systemd. so thats why…
>> sometimes i need more than 1 mountpoint, but still you are right.
>> thanks and sorry for the noise.
> But why can't you create the same dir structure under /mnt?
i can (an will) of course. until now /media was the place. no problem at 
all. i just like to understand whats going on, you know…