[arch-general] Why Multiple Forums for different issues? Arch Linux/ARM?

Karol Blazewicz karol.blazewicz at gmail.com
Mon Jul 9 21:59:15 EDT 2012


On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2012 4:03 AM, "Kevin Mihelich" <kevin at archlinuxarm.org> wrote:
>> I'd be more than happy to work with more developers from upstream, and I
>> just want to re-emphasize that we're in no way some rogue derivative
> flying
>> your flag.  If anyone wants to get involved or learn more about what goes
>> on, feel free to contact me by email or on IRC.
>
> I thought this would have been obvious from the outset, actually. Am
> surprised how quickly trademark and "cease and desist" letters got
> mentioned in a mailing list for an open source project...

The link I posted refers to a site that's down atm
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=115643 and so are the links
to tinycore forums:
http://jeffhoogland.blogspot.com/2011/03/tiny-core-fraud-on-source-forge.html
http://sourceforge.net/blog/another-lesson-learned-clear-communication-is-key



On topic: I don't see the point of creating unified forums but keeping
e.g. bugtrackers separate.


More information about the arch-general mailing list