[arch-general] UEFI secure boot
s.jansen at gmail.com
Mon Jun 4 16:59:42 EDT 2012
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Sudaraka Wijesinghe
<sudaraka.wijesinghe at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/04/12 23:48, Genes MailLists wrote:
>> Just to add another fedora link:
>> Sounds like they till plan to make use of the UEFI CA $99 signing
>> service from Microsoft.
>> Do you think Arch should follow suit or require instead that Secure
>> Boot is disabled?
> If this is a poll, I vote "Arch should require Secure Boot to be disabled"
It's not a poll. I don't see how your ( idea / lack of choice ) is any better.
More information about the arch-general