[arch-general] Pacman keys

[David Benfell]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/04/12 19:39, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 05/06/12 12:37, David Benfell wrote:
>> On 06/04/12 15:46, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:11 PM, David Benfell 
>>> <benfell at parts-unknown.org> wrote:
>>>> I *think* you're right. But perhaps pacman-key should give a
>>>> clue that this is what's going on.
>> 
>>> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28027 If you have time, please
>>> file this upstream if it haven't been filed in the mean time.
>> 
>> The decision at that link seems to view this as an upstream
>> problem and points to https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/ as
>> upstream. But the latter link never mentions pacman. So I'm
>> confused.
>> 
> 
> Because pacman has nothing to do with generating a key.  It is all
> gnupg...
> 
Ah, but gnupg on its own advises that it needs entropy. I didn't see
this message from pacman-key, so pacman-key would seem to be
*suppressing* the message. If I'm getting all this right, then the
decision to bump this upstream seems inappropriate.

- -- 
David Benfell
benfell at parts-unknown.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPzXM0AAoJELT202JKF+xpKVAP/16+yG55LbtF7g7msH2fqs4s
VSOxH89elw226d9GfsEQu/36H5wWNdua++KOGpVLvj9pM1IWs4LGLsmyDSXSBMH6
PQyTNT8tRniBPpVzGWZJmD2kd1npzAaIrV7ds2tfVF6PA3wOJhwAFtR6wpUX7hw8
dA49X2YPRL40nMpVm7emuNbP1wyhbpVJJm58rbxloiPrfFYIorAbL6RMl7EtVP+W
T1FsiIf1EahdInhNavfgvV+D2xdhmZPKw8v7s2MVA76VUwF0xB3iHCIEx/LZb6DP
1dlXsVwC3Hvfw3U+s9TaHjsxjXEVy9+qp4U/4BmpHED9UMsJC/4G+IWVwff7zJbd
zDmQbVDC3QCQkf/GO/PqzUp+4YB4OpUCsqKdAmIxpAeZD8IWgBYcUuPQ0bTL2kDh
2aZdaGYGn1M+t4nxbXnD+LQloEjPCcftoEMLCWZMa/YKZNyhBUJAHLWBF/9Ic+QD
HUikIGvy6cJ7sdLRCFoquolnwXPQ/LszBZ0M8MEaOv438Le38K9ZKVblw6qUrnwx
YA0RPbVjkip/P33Coek2bpvjoVXZkzCAsg8XAPKpgO7RuMihPVob0KAnflAEhpBJ
6LCVeMK8cTkXHKEdn0SoP3VLbSI+B+a8EB12IsbrsaK0gB4qS46G1gU9vH05n8+D
ZI11+6daTUCzDl/1FyMm
=pBam
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----