[arch-general] Package signing: database signatures?

[Allan McRae]

On 05/03/12 19:39, Christian Hesse wrote:
> And even more interesting: Does it make sense to add a new option
> 'PkgRequired'? This could force valid signatures for packages and make it
> optional for database files.


You mean like the "PackageRequired" option that is already there?  Or
you could use "Required DatabaseOptional".

Allan