[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] steam in our repos?
artafinde at gmail.com
Thu Nov 15 06:35:06 EST 2012
On 15 Nov 2012 10:15, "Gaetan Bisson" <bisson at archlinux.org> wrote:
> [2012-11-15 09:23:43 +0000] Leonidas Spyropoulos:
> > And written permission should be the emails, thus I believe we are fine.
> Written permission should be a legally binding document. An email
> stating the personal opinion of somebody who is neither a lawyer nor
> official representative of the copyright holder (the company) has no
> legal value.
> Of course nobody cares; people just want to throw more and more binary
> blobs in [community] because it's cool and the AUR is for losers...
Fair enough I can understand that, so having it in the AUR instead will
save us from all that discussion since it's not binary, it's just a link
for fetching and unzipping it, right?
More information about the arch-general