[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] steam in our repos?

Gaetan Bisson bisson at archlinux.org
Thu Nov 15 06:57:05 EST 2012


[2012-11-15 11:35:06 +0000] Leonidas Spyropoulos:
> On 15 Nov 2012 10:15, "Gaetan Bisson" <bisson at archlinux.org> wrote:
> >
> > [2012-11-15 09:23:43 +0000] Leonidas Spyropoulos:
> > > And written permission should be the emails, thus I believe we are fine.
> >
> > Written permission should be a legally binding document. An email
> > stating the personal opinion of somebody who is neither a lawyer nor
> > official representative of the copyright holder (the company) has no
> > legal value.
> >
> > Of course nobody cares; people just want to throw more and more binary
> > blobs in [community] because it's cool and the AUR is for losers...
> 
> Fair enough I can understand that, so having it in the AUR instead will
> save us from all that discussion since it's not binary, it's just a link
> for fetching and unzipping it, right?

Roughly yes: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository

Use the AUR - you will love it. I don't know when people started
thinking the AUR wasn't good enough for their packages anymore...

-- 
Gaetan


More information about the arch-general mailing list