[arch-general] Why is netcfg again in [base]?

[A Rojas]

Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> 
> That's incorrect. Only subscribers with a consistent record of
> constructive contributions get whitelisted. And the process is
> completely manual.
> 

That's not what this message [1] seems to suggest. Thanks for the 
clarification.

> So far you've only posted three times in 2013; that's not "many times".
> And although your messages do not seem time critical to me, I would like
> to point out that your original one in this thread was received by our
> servers at 06:12 and accepted by me at 07:18 (both times UTC-04).
> 
> Please do contribute constructively to this list and you will get
> whitelisted eventually.
> 

Well I've tried, but it's not very encouraging to see your messages get lost 
on the moderation filter (I assume because by the time some moderator takes a 
look at them the topic has already been solved)

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.arch.general/46208/