[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] BIND10? No, thanks.
lisaev at umail.iu.edu
Sat Mar 9 14:00:37 EST 2013
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 13:27:42 +1100
Gaetan Bisson <bisson at archlinux.org> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Currently we use the BIND code base in two packages:
> - dnsutils from [core] provides basic DNS query tools;
> - bind from [extra] is the actual name server.
> With the new BIND10 release, the ISC really outdid themselves: all
> formerly standalone tools have been merged and rewritten as a python
> script which uses bindings to the new libb10-* series of libraries that
> are shared with the name server. Python being such a boring dependency,
> they introduced another three: botan, log4cplus, and boost!
> That mostly means two things:
> - We cannot keep splitting dnsutils and bind anymore.
> - I do not want to maintain these packages any further.
> We already have ldns in [core], a much better written (and sane) DNS
> library which includes query tools that are near drop-in replacements
> for BIND's: use `drill` instead of `dig`, etc.
> So I suggest:
> - Any package relying on dnsutils and its tools (dig, host, nslookup) be
> ported to use ldns instead - should be straightforward in most cases.
> - We ditch dnsutils and bind out of our repos, unless somebody finds
> them fun and wants to maintain them in [extra] or [community].
> Comments or suggestions are welcome.
Great. I was actually going to open a feature request for this on flyspray.
The only thing: whouldn't one need community/unbound (unbound-host AFAIR) to
GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D
Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the arch-general