[arch-general] about the removal of that systemd symlink...

[Karol Blazewicz]

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:32 AM, David Benfell
<benfell at parts-unknown.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was alarmed, I think unnecessarily, when I saw the message that a
> symlink for systemd was removed on an upgrade.
>
> As near as I can tell, the boot sequence still relies on init, which
> links to the right place.
>
> Is there a better way to keep track of changes like this so I'm not
> surprised?
>
> Thanks!

Not reading pacman's output may lead to problems.
Why do you think it's a bad way?