[arch-general] about the removal of that systemd symlink...

[Iru Cai]

2013/5/13 Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazewicz at gmail.com>

> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:32 AM, David Benfell
> <benfell at parts-unknown.org> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was alarmed, I think unnecessarily, when I saw the message that a
> > symlink for systemd was removed on an upgrade.
> >
> > As near as I can tell, the boot sequence still relies on init, which
> > links to the right place.
> >
> > Is there a better way to keep track of changes like this so I'm not
> > surprised?
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> Not reading pacman's output may lead to problems.
>
Well, some people seldom read pacman's output. e.g. I use a cron job to use
pacman to update the system, and I don't read the log very often.

> Why do you think it's a bad way?
>
Maybe some people haven't installed systemd-sysvcompat and still use
'init=/bin/systemd' .