[arch-general] Official releases from upstream
danielmicay at gmail.com
Sun Nov 23 09:51:23 UTC 2014
On 23/11/14 04:35 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> while for virtualbox Arch Linux does follow upstream, even while there
> is a critical known USB issue, for Claws Mail, where AFAIK isn't a
> critical issue, it doesn't follow upstream.
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 09:07:22 +0000
> noreply at thewildbeast.co.uk wrote:
>> The latest release is v. 3.11.1, what can you observe with that?
> "Stable release 3.11.1 (October 27, 2014; 23 days ago)" -
> "Latest Release: 3.11.1 (News), on 27 October 2014" -
> $ pacman -Si claws-mail | grep Ver
> Version : 3.11.0-2
> I try to understand this, but I can't understand it. Is there latitude
> for the maintainers to decide what is an official release from upstream
> and what isn't?
> The Claws package isn't a problem for me.
> $ pacman -Q claws-mail-git
> claws-mail-git 3.11.1.r26.g00cade7-1
> But the virtualbox package is really an annoyance.
Packages are updated when the maintainers have time to do it.
This crappy trolling isn't helping your case.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the arch-general