[arch-general] Why was wpa_supplicant.conf renamed wpa_supplicant.conf.pacsav??

[Doug Newgard]

On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:25:00 -0600
"David C. Rankin" <drankinatty at suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:

>   Here, anyone relying on remote access via wpa_supplicant is left dead in the
> water unless they catch the comment as it scrolls by before rebooting. (yes
> they should review the comments, but with human nature what it is...)
> 

Another case of "ignore what pacman tells you at your own peril".