[arch-general] [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?

[Magnus Therning]

Ralf Mardorf writes:

> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 12:22:46 +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
>>Personally I've not come across anything in new releases of Gnome that
>>has been even close to that irritating.
>
> Dropping the menu bar isn't irritating? Employers need to re-train
> staff, if such a radical change happens, not to mention that there even
> could be the need to buy new hardware, because the graphics could be to
> slow, when 3D capability is required. It's not only expensive, but
> also polluting. I don't know another DE that made such evil changes as
> GNOME does, IMO it's the most worse DE of all DEs.

Nope, it wasn't irritating *to me*.  I can fully understand that others
found it irritating, I'm just saying that I didn't.

/M

--
Magnus Therning              OpenPGP: 0x927912051716CE39
email: magnus at therning.org   jabber: magnus at therning.org
twitter: magthe               http://therning.org/magnus

Hofstadter's Law: It always takes longer than you expect, even when you
take into account Hofstadter's Law.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 800 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20160101/eb8d2a72/attachment.asc>