[arch-general] Firefox without signature checking

Damjan Georgievski gdamjan at gmail.com
Sat Jan 2 20:47:09 UTC 2016


>> This sounds like something for the AUR. I do not agree with this move from
>> Mozilla and it would be interesting to see the interest in such a package.
>>
>
>  Agree - AUR.
>
>  Arch should follow upstream - if there is a spin off alternative with this
> disenagaged (HigherFox or whatever) ... we can certainly choose a different
> package - but Arch should stick with the upstream version.
>
>  Aside:
>   I don't use firefox - but curious - how would one test developer versions
> of extensions then? Or is this no longer possible in firefox?

There will be support for that of course
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/Distribution


-- 
damjan


More information about the arch-general mailing list