[arch-general] Firefox without signature checking
Emil Lundberg
lundberg.emil at gmail.com
Sat Jan 2 21:01:10 UTC 2016
>
> This sounds like something for the AUR. I do not agree with this move from
> Mozilla and it would be interesting to see the interest in such a package.
>
If that is Mozilla's plan, I will most definitely use or make an
alternative package. I use Pentadactyl, which is currently unsigned, and I
will not switch away from it anytime soon. I agree that an alternative
package would probably belong in the AUR, at least for starters.
>
More information about the arch-general
mailing list