[arch-general] [OT] Favorite/best desktop in archlinux
Magnus Therning
magnus at therning.org
Fri Nov 11 10:23:05 UTC 2016
Eli Schwartz via arch-general <arch-general at archlinux.org> writes:
> On 11/08/2016 08:03 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> Um, the Qt licensing is rather more complicated than that nowadays:
>> https://www.qt.io/licensing-comparison/
>>
>> I think it went something like (vastly simplified and not weighed down
>> by any sort of actual knowledge)
>>
>> 1. Trolltech used GPL on everything and sold a commercial license to
>> actually make money.
>> 2. Nokia bought Trolltech and didn't feel a need to make money on Qt,
>> so they relicensed the lib under LGPL.
>> 3. The Qt Company is back to needing to make money on Qt, so some newer
>> parts are GPL.
>
> True, but LGPL >= GPL and however you slice it, it is not "closed sw".
>
> Granted, some newer things are actually (sometimes?) completely closed
> source and only available under a commercial license, but that is not
> "Qt", it is addons to Qt which AFAIK aren't even something e.g. KDE
> actually are interested in.
>
> Mainly, my point is that Qt is actually an amazing model of a
> commercially-developed FLOSS software with a sustainable business model
> that accommodates both the commercial and open-source communities, and
> it is kind of painful to hear someone accuse it of being "closed sw",
> with all the attendant evil-anti-Linux-project emotional baggage that is
> likely to evoke.
We are in violent agreement on this!
I just felt your first statement was a simplification that bordered on
making it factually incorrect, hence my comment.
/M
--
Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0x927912051716CE39
email: magnus at therning.org jabber: magnus at therning.org
twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
If voting could really change things it would be illegal.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 800 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20161111/88334d64/attachment.asc>
More information about the arch-general
mailing list