[arch-general] Does LTS package really not fit to Rolling Release model and Arch Philosophy?

[Tinu Weber]

On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 08:31:22 +0900, Ken OKABE via arch-general wrote:
> > The kernel is a different, as it can cause an unbootable situation.
>
> [...]
>
> On what reason or scenario, some LTS(maybe incompatible to the kernel)
> will break kernel or make the system unbootable?

Ideally never. The unbootable situation may be caused by the *kernel
itself*. I admit I'm a little amused about my forum post sparking a ML
discussion, but to quote another post on that same thread (by Jason):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

Best,
Tinu a.k.a. ayekat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20161119/01ad131e/attachment.asc>