[arch-general] users memlock value

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 16:02:37 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 14:02:42 +0200, David Runge wrote:
>>Also, please don't double post your issues. Give people time to
>>actually respond. No need to post to arch-general, if you brought this
>>up before. This is not an instant messenger service.  
>
>PS: Independent of what is required for a realtime (or the old audio)
>group and that there is no issue when using
>limits.d/file_with_a_higher_number.conf , I still question that
>'@users - memlock 1024' should be set by package. I doubt that a
>default 'memlock 1024' for the 'users' group is a good choice at all.

PPS: And I forgot to mention, what Fons' pointed out and actually was
the issue that I experienced:

On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 16:55:49 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>But that effectively means you need to opt out of whatever some
>'vendor' pushes down your throat. Not once, but everytime you update.

The link to the complete message:
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-proaudio/2018-September/000201.html

So at least an announcement via
https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-announce should be considered.

-- 
pacman -Q linux{,-rt{-pussytoes,-cornflower,,-securityink}}|cut -d\  -f2
4.18.5.arch1-1
4.18_rc8_rt1-1
4.16.18_rt12-1
4.16.18_rt11-1
4.16.18_rt10-1