[arch-general] AppArmor support

[Filipe Laíns]

On Sun, 2018-09-09 at 15:04 +0100, Filipe Laíns via arch-general wrote:
> Hey Gus,
> 
> I'm sorry but I'm not the maintainer :/. You'll need to talk to them
> again. If you think the closure of the bug was wrong I suggest to
> send
> a mail to the mailing list explaining this.
> 
> Why don't you use linux-hardened instead? It's up-to-date and has
> both
> options enabled (AppArmor and SELinux).
> 
> I feel that it's the biggest issue. We already have a kernel with
> both
> options enabled so there's no point on also adding them in the main
> one, given that those option require a lot of userspace support. Do
> you
> have relevant reason why you don't want to use linux-hardened? If so,
> that would probably change some things.
> 
> Thanks,
> Filipe Laíns
> 3DCE 51D6 0930 EBA4 7858 BA41 46F6 33CB B0EB 4BF2

Hey,

Nevermind my reply. The email somehow didn't get moved to my mailing
list folder so I thought it was sent to my address directly. Sorry for
the confusion.

Thanks,
Filipe Laíns
3DCE 51D6 0930 EBA4 7858 BA41 46F6 33CB B0EB 4BF2
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20180909/75737529/attachment.asc>