[arch-general] AppArmor support

[Leonid Isaev]

On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 02:53:04PM -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> Heftig retracted his initial willingness to enable apparmor because he
> did not think it useful enough without the userland tools. It wasn't
> rejected because we hate the idea or consider it not Arch-like... it was
> rejected because on its own, it could be considered not-important-enough
> to warrant enabling.

FWIW, I actually agree with #59733: CONFIG_AUDIT=n was blocking AppArmor
adoption... Perhaps relevant:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/08/msg00090.html .

But I have a question: why was AUDIT enabled in the first place? I thought it
was cosidered useless?

Cheers,
L.

-- 
Leonid Isaev