[arch-general] The differences among bootx64.efi, loader.efi and grubx64.efi.
ralph at inputplus.co.uk
Wed Nov 20 09:49:05 UTC 2019
> > The UEFI boot paths look weird because FAT32 uses Windows-style
> > backslash path separators.
> But I tried both of the following on *nix based distros, and it seems
> both will be correct:
> -l \\EFI\\boot\bootx64.efi
> -l /EFI/boot/bootx64.efi
Use the source that's processing the -l option;
it's perhaps converting / into \ for the user's convenience.
More information about the arch-general