[arch-general] `base` group replaced by mandatory `base` package - manual intervention required

[Yaro Kasear]

On 10/9/19 9:39 AM, Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 10:19:38 -0400, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
>> On 10/9/19 10:11 AM, Tinu Weber wrote:
>>> https://web.archive.org/web/20190722121302/https://www.archlinux.org/groups/x86_64/base/  
>> Perfect - thank you!
> IMO 'reiserfsprogs' is a good pointer for what reason to change 'base'
> makes sense ;). It's a package good for backwards compatibility, but
> probably not useful for a base install ;).
>
Heck, jfsutils. Does anyone actually use JFS outside of backwards
compatibility

support for older IBM systems? It bewilders me that it was in the
original base group,

honestly.

Yaro