[arch-general] Why bind-tools was merged into bind package?

Óscar García Amor ogarcia at moire.org
Tue Jul 21 08:45:28 UTC 2020

El lun., 20 jul. 2020 a las 15:25, Eli Schwartz
(<eschwartz at archlinux.org>) escribió:
> On 7/20/20 3:15 AM, Óscar García Amor wrote:
> > The problem is. [...]
> Don't be facetious.

It's only a joke, don't take me seriously.

> >  In this [...]
> > safer don't have a service installed than installed an disabled.
> You have a right to that opinion. However, if you intend to convince
> anyone *else* that this is indeed the case, you will need to do more
> than merely state your point of view. Specifically, you will need to
> prove it.

The truth is that my arguments are those, simplicity and security. Is
true that I can rebuild package or add some configurations to avoid
user creation or file installations, but I'm thinking in less advanced
users. Anyway if you think that "this is the way" (Mandalorian dixit)
I cannot argue anything else and I accept the decision.

Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me

More information about the arch-general mailing list